Rights & Protection

How to Legally Stop a Loan App’s Endless Calls and Messages

Twelve calls a day is not collection — it is harassment. The written no-contact instruction, the escalation ladder, and the evidence trail that ends the ringing.

There is a difference between a lender reminding you of a due date and a lender running a pressure campaign — dawn calls, rotating numbers, dozens of WhatsApp messages, agents who hang up and redial. Nigerian consumer protection draws that line clearly, and there is a calm, escalating sequence that moves you to the right side of it.

Know where collection ends and harassment begins

Reasonable contact means: it reaches you, at civilised hours, through channels you can answer, about a debt that is genuinely due. It stops being reasonable when it becomes constant, insulting, threatening, timed to terrorise, or aimed at your contacts instead of you. The rules collectors must operate within are set out in the debt-collector rulebook — when they cross those lines, the following ladder applies.

Step 1: put your instruction in writing — once

Silence and screaming both feed the script; a written instruction starves it. Send one message, inside the app and to official support email, in these terms: “All further communication about this account must be in writing to this email address only. Do not call me, and do not contact any third party about this account. I am recording all contact for regulatory purposes.” Then stop arguing. Every call after that instruction is a dated entry in your file.

Step 2: log, block, preserve

  • Keep a one-line log per attempt: date, time, number, what was said.
  • Screenshot abusive messages before blocking; blocking stops the noise but not the evidence you already hold.
  • Back everything up off the phone, as the harassment playbook shows.

Step 3: file the regulator complaints

A written no-contact instruction plus a contact log is precisely what a consumer-protection complaint wants: a lender ignoring a lawful instruction, with dates. File with the FCCPC through our step-by-step process; if your contacts were messaged, add the data-protection complaint. Reference your instruction email and attach the log.

Step 4: escalate to a demand letter

If the barrage survives the complaints, a lawyer’s letter repricing the lender’s decision is the next rung — when it is worth the cost is covered in the demand-letter guide. For defamation already sent to third parties, measure the losses first: what a defamation claim can recover.

What not to do

  • Do not negotiate in the comment section of your own life — no heated calls, no replies to every message. One written channel, one instruction.
  • Do not pay any “agent” who calls demanding payment to a personal account; repay only through the lender’s official channels, which keep receipts.
  • Do not ignore a genuine debt while fighting the method — see how to negotiate a plan so the account’s substance is handled while you end the noise.

Keep the endgame in view

Every rung of this ladder exists to make abuse expensive. Borrowers who climb it in order — instruction, log, complaint, letter — overwhelmingly report the same outcome: the calls stop, because the next borrower on the list is cheaper to scare than you are to fight.

One sentence in writing, calmly kept records, and the state’s machinery. That is how the ringing stops.